Has the Kachina Bridge Dinosaur been refuted?
Jul 01, 2011

A recent article by the Smithsonian, referencing research by Senter and Cole, claims to refute that an ancient petroglyph is a dinosaur. According to Senter and Cole, the "dinosaur" is nothing more than a combination of other petroglyphs, possible mud stains and erosion. Read Vance's response that has been read around the world.
LINK: Kachina Bridge Dinosaur Refuted? (5MB PDF)
LINK: Kachina Bridge Dinosaur Refuted? (10MB PDF)
Tags:
kachina bridge, petroglyph